Research
Working Papers
Abstract
This paper introduces a time-series methodology to quantify heterogeneity in the dynamics of the unconditional temperature distribution and its association with climate drivers. By recognizing that temperature unconditional quantiles represent temperatures at different locations—or seasons—, I establish an equivalence between a structural One-Dimensional Energy Balance Model (1D-EBM) and a statistical reduced-form Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) for a range of distributional characteristics of temperature—mean and quantiles—and total radiative forcing, including radiative forcing from anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs). The VECM is estimated employing time-series methods agnostic about the type of trends (stochastic or deterministic) in climate data, and is utilized to produce the following outcomes of practical interest for economic analyses: i) estimation of long-run responses of temperature distribution to changes in GHGs, ii) long-term temperature density forecasts, iii) conditional projections of temperature distribution under different scenarios of future GHGs emissions, iv) extraction of the common-trending component behind the existing warming trend, and v) identification of distributional climate shocks and impulse-response analysis. An empirical study using station-level temperature records (1880–2021) reveals strong climate heterogeneity at global, hemispheric, and continental (Europe) scales, with important potential implications for damage analysis and integrated assessment modeling. A deeper understanding of global warming dynamics is crucial for informing more efficient adaptation and mitigation policies.Abstract
This document examines the effect of precipitation shocks on poverty status in Ecuador. Using gridded monthly precipitation data from 2007 to 2021, we define measures for the excess and deficit in precipitation levels at the parish geographical level. This data is merged with household socioeconomic information obtained from the National Survey of Employment, Unemployment, and Underemployment (ENEMDU). Our empirical findings reveal that both excess and deficit in precipitation significantly affect poverty status, with these effects displaying strong heterogeneity across economic sectors. Variations in the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), whether positive or negative, lead to an increased probability of poverty among workers in the primary sector (specifically, those engaged in fishing and agriculture). In contrast, we observe poverty-reducing effects for the secondary and tertiary sectors. Factors such as formality status, urban/rural location, and the nature of employment play crucial roles in moderating the estimated effects. Per-capita household income and labor income are key channels to explain our findings.Abstract
Accurate tracking of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is crucial for shaping climate policies and meeting global decarbonization targets. However, energy consumption and emissions data are released annually and with substantial publication lags, hindering timely decision-making. This paper introduces a panel nowcasting framework to produce higher-frequency predictions of the state-level growth rate of per-capita energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the United States (U.S.). Our approach employs a panel mixed-data sampling (MIDAS) model to predict per-capita energy consumption growth, considering quarterly personal income, monthly electricity consumption, and the weekly economic conditions index as predictors. A bridge equation linking per-capita CO2 emissions growth with the nowcasts of energy consumption is estimated using panel quantile regression methods. A pseudo out-of-sample study (2009-2018), simulating the real-time data release calendar, confirms the improved accuracy of our nowcasts with respect to a historical benchmark. Our results suggest that by leveraging the availability of higher-frequency indicators, we not only enhance predictive accuracy for per-capita energy consumption growth but also provide more reliable estimates of the distribution of CO2 emissions growth.Publications
Journal of Development Economics, 175: 103494. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103494
Economics Letters, 244: 111992. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111992
Replication files
SERIEs Journal of the Spanish Economics Association, 15: 327-348. doi: 10.1007/s13209-023-00288-w
Replication files
Economica, 90(360): 1397-1421. doi: 10.1111/ecca.12491